There has been a considerable gap in postings here because I was ambushed by a Federal blow-off of my habeas corpus appeal and request for review from the Supreme Court. (You now know someone who has filed to the U.S. Supreme Court, albeit unsuccessfully) Since then I have resubmitted a restated, updated and more complete constitutional claim to the corrupt, wrong and procedurally handicapped district court in which I was sentenced upon a fabricated scenario of "materially false information." This MFI arose and became accepted fact because my defense attorney made it up, in lieu of investigation and actually defending me. In retrospect I think she thought me a milquetoast doormat not worthy of representation. My post-conviction attorney addressed only her abdication of responsibility to investigate the circumstances of my offense. He did not address her more constitutionally offensive result of extemporaneously fabricating a myth for the court to over-sentence me upon. This post-conviction attorney has now conveniently forgotten that he only filed half of a post-conviction claim - maybe if he had been able to bankrupt my mother twice he would have filed a full claim. So now I am obliged to file an amendment to the current legal treatise explaining to the aforementioned corrupt court that the post-conviction attorney was always committed to only half condemning the trial attorney for her numerous sixth amendment (and fifth and fourteenth) deficiencies in failing to represent me (new appeal is posted in earlier entry). I have to remain committed to composing this amendment and keep on pounding this same logical nail into the ignorant head of bureaucracy!
In the meantime, or soon after this amendment, I hope to polish two drafts I have from last year on, 1.) the ecology of prison, and 2.)the dysfunction of prison management to produce the opposite result of a functional penitentiary. Also, based upon my legal and court experiences, I hope to post a psychological travel journal of how the judicial branch works, titled: "Everything You Know Is Wrong."
~~~~~~
Closed circuit channels are showing "The Rum Diaries" this weekend. It seems as good as I recall the book. I read it when it came out To Colorado in the fall of 1999? Thompson always made me feel as if he may have been the only person to have ever had any effect. I still say "Don't let the bastards get you down," one of his notable catch phrases. Of course we have let the bastards, Cheney, Rumsfeld, et.al, burn us with extreme prejudice since the late 60's and early 70's. U.S. citizens have submitted to a government which has tied them into a 35 year Gordian knot in our name and no war of journalist ink can ever untie it. It is all polluted water under a collapsing bridge now.
I just finished a good treatise on this topic by a right wing shit bag named Mark Steyn, called "After America; Get Ready For Armageddon." It’s a fairly accurate evaluation of how the empire will unravel, although he blames government exclusively. The correct blame lies with government's subjugation to the corporate construct and analysis of how contrary that is to public will and welfare. Of course he favors corporate will and welfare as a means to provide (by corporate altruism?!!) public welfare; a strong corporate state hale and hearty populous. Yea, alright Stalin.
As counterbalance to such unbalanced screed I am now reading "Economics Without Illusions; Debunking Myths Of Modern Capitalism." This should Segway into the next essay I want to post here - "Everything You Know Is Wrong." Basically every assumption, or campaign statement, about how things function (or fail to function) is grossly skewed or outright wrong.
That will have to wait until I draft an amendment to the current legal filing that explains to the court that they cannot fabricate fact by edict and that their fabricated beliefs about my sentencing and post-conviction attorney are wrong. Hopefully it does not have to happen to you to believe how wrong your current understanding of criminal courts may be. Believe me! ;)
~~~~~~
The best line from "The Rum Diaries": the degenerate has the Hunter Thompson character give him a pecker check for the drip and asks, "Is it the clap?" Thompson responds dryly, "A standing ovation."
Thinking of Thompson reminded me of his intervention the Lisl Auman criminal case (Essay by J.P. on this case is posted following the end of this blog entry) and the corresponding Vanity Fair article. That article may have been his last work of his characteristic outrage. It inspired me to try a magazine length piece that I titled, "Thompson, Auman and Judges." This is supposed to have the same phenomic resonance as the title of Warren Zevon's song, "Lawyers, Guns and Money." That was the theme song for Thompson's campaign to get Lisl (not a misspelling) a retrial.
The Auman case made me think about the "Everything You Know Is Wrong" essay that I want to write, but characteristically may recraft as some ‘rambling on’ intention versus results, or an essay I may never get to! In the stead of this future essay I would like to offer the older one, which addresses how one can not kill anyone but still be prosecuted for murder. This should count as something contrary to what you previously knew, or speculated, about homicide prosecutions.
[Hopefully my agent has the time and resources to make the essay available. ;)] Yes Jason, I always have the time for you and hopefully always have the resources.
If anyone is so inclined to look up any current info on Lisl I would like to know how she has fared since starting 20 year community corrections in lieu of the natural death prison sentence she (and HST) got overturned.
Also, I'd be interested in being signed me up for something so I can get occasional e-mail. jason.pecci@gmail.com -which his agent will forward on to him. ;)
Stay tuned, continue learning, keep in touch.
Jason / posted March 16, 2012
Note from his agent: April 1st will mark 10 years of incarceration
No comments:
Post a Comment