Big Debt, Ignorance and Empire
The new risk of a double dip recession and government debt approaching 100% of annual GDP are consequences of long term interventionism, both domestically and internationally. Generations of government knows best paternalism has succumbed to accumulated debt and over-obligation. Welcome to the death throes of an empire.
Beginning with the industrial revolution government began to acknowledge the corporate construct as the economic vehicle of choice to match manufacturing to labor. All government had to do was enforce laws to regulate the architecture of U.S. commerce and the corporations would function as benevolent monarchies - serving the interests of themselves, their employees and the government that allows them to function so well. This is still the Pablum the U.S. sells to foreign countries and to domestic voters. Possibly there existed such an ideal and delicate balance for two consecutive quarters in the 1920's. Corporate self-interest quickly off loaded obligations onto the government and subverted regulations, thereby feigning support for a democratic populace while functioning as independent, and not benevolent, monarchies.
World war two kinked this trend domestically, but in a perverse twist, brought the degenerate trend international. The idea of a populace subservient to an industry or monolithic corporations was not foreign to broken and frustrated survivors of world war. However, the charade that neither they nor their government were serfs to the industrialists was quite novel. The U.S. sold this inverted relationship between industry and government as the means by which they were able to join and win WWII.
"Just be like us. Our industriousness begets economic self-determination." Please ignore the fact that war is a grotesquely leveraged government jobs program and all subsequent employment depends on the government as a customer or a benefactor, in the form of subsidies, tax breaks, land grants, tax waivers, government backed insurance ... [more small print disclaimer bull shit]
Why not follow the lead of the captain that won the game for the team? Rebuild industry and establish economic self-determinism; all under the paternalistic U.S. military industry. Military cooperation worked well and functions as a paradigm for corporate cooperation, which requires U.S. military protection - just for security (wink, wink). Again, please neglect that an ideal government and financial model would stand on its own merits and not require military garrison to impress upon a previously sovereign nation.
All future transactions from this point on are under varying degrees of duress for the victim country. The long, undignified and overt shadow of global garrisoning by the U.S. has become tacit over three generations and intervening Korean and Vietnamese conflicts. By the Reagan/Bush I era the cost of doing business with the U.S. entailed a one-sided military agreement that required garrisoning by the U.S. This intervention is always accompanied by financial infiltration by economic hit men for the big multinationals (military contractors, natural resource exploiters, financial subjugators etc.), that is to say that this is a tacit occupation by its military/industrial symbiont. From the former sovereign's perspective the most insidious global racketeers have mugged them for the privilege of membership in the global archipelago of foreign U.S. - hideous oxymoron - military installations.
There are well over 500 such installations (737 in 2007). This does not consider supposedly domestic federal agencies that imitate this infiltration paradigm, while operating under their own agreement. E.g. the DEA operates 80 offices in 62 countries under the guise of public safety; although prosecutor and prison industry job security are the only observable "public safety" effects. Of course this is the point - create an imagined problem, infiltrate militarily to correct it (under some specious appeal to safety or security of the populace), open the money taps to the corporations that engineered the false problem and onerous solution, repeat globally. The victim country beefs up their cops,their military, and their prisons and becomes a serf nation in the image of the U.S. – supplicant to the corporate construct of the exploiters and subjugators mentioned above.
The predator corporations employ political/social engineering, and often private military divisions to maintain their operations under the new established order. This should seem familiar to U.S. citizens; it is the raison d'etre of the CIA!
The Vietnam era brought too much transparency to this method of creeping empire. Instead of a re-evaluation and adjustment of insidious behavior, the corporate gangsters simply twisted a side effect of the Vietnam insurrection - global distribution of primo Asian heroin by the U.S. military - as the new problem requiring yet more permanent garrisoning by U.S. agencies. This follows the Roman decline whereby; assassination of the Imperial Caesar brought only more imperialism in the form of the three emperor triumvirate, rather than a return to representative government.
Three plus generations of this accelerating imperialism is finally paying off with self-destruction. After putting so many thumbs in so many eyes for 50+ years - and considering everything a necessary success - a group of Middle Easterners called Al-queda made their dissent known. Yet again, like the refusal to abandon international imperial behavior upon international disenfranchisement for the Vietnam debacle, the U.S. chose to speed up collapse with an increase in imperialism toward the Middle East. Intervention and occupation that inspired suicide hijackers has been nothing more than a government funded jobs program for profiteer contractors . The result has been financial collapse and a high contrast exclamation point to mark the “flame out” of the greatest democracy known to have existed.
Every solution, and resulting problem, implemented by the U.S. government is the repercussion of intervention that aggravates, instead of counteracts, the perceived problems. This applies domestically and internationally. There is a bullshit political propaganda aphorism often utilized to promote the continuing U.S. imperialism abroad, via the military/corporate construct, and corporate/extreme wealth class domestically that states: "a rising tide floats all boats." This can be recast to address interventionism: "Inverse correction aggravates all problems."
The U.S. budget (domestic economics) is a perfect representation. Every effort to counteract economic cycles with government spending accelerates the rebound, and is not throttled back upon recovery. Thus, there is increased waste of subsidies to corporations, excessive garrisoning of the planet (which acts as security for the corporations molesting the resources of the occupied countries), foregone collection of fees and taxes, and assumption of pension defaults and all general social welfare etc.
Upon the next - and unnecessarily larger – down stroke, comes more poisonous government/military support of corporations; the debilitating assumption of corporate defaults is undertaken and self-destruction is assured. This is the equivalent of taking unneeded steroids as a teenager, and then consuming increasing amounts until near lethal doses will not sustain life in middle age. The U.S. has gone from middle aged to death by this paradigm, in fifty years.
The kicker is that the parasite - the corporate construct - now thrives on its own. It flies high from the broken springboard of U.S. imperialism, in every established and emerging economy in the world. Perversely these countries are less the victim than the U.S. They assume no un-remunerated material nor financial supporting role for the predatory corporations. Most are, in fact, savvy enough to collect due fees and taxes that the U.S. inexplicably waives domestically. Thus the corporate construct sits on deck as the next imperial power whilst the U.S. recedes into ignominy.
© Jason Pecci 2011
Saturday, October 1, 2011
Monday, September 5, 2011
Culture Shock
Dear Senator,
Jim Webbs bill, The Second Chance Act, S. 306, for a commission to study criminal justice reform is taking too long to move forward. This is supported by several hundred organizations, and millions of people. What is the problem; why the stall tactic?
Corrections Corporation of America is now buying an Ohio State Prison. We need to reduce our prison population, not continue 'as is' for profit. Who are their lobbyists? Who is being subtly paid off? How many of our decision makers own stock in this publicly traded company? These are some of the questions that need answering in order to discover where and why the passing of this bill is stalled.
OK, the deficit is not the problem here; could it be the fear of unemployment? Those who want Obama out want to keep those numbers where they are. At the same time they don’t want to increase unemployment, by decreasing the number of prison guards. Everyone in the U.S. Congress appears to be sitting on their hands, regarding S.306.
Prison Guards unions and others involved in our “Incarceration Nation” are being coddled; the barbed wire companies, the telephone companies, the canteen companies, the clothing manufacturers, shoe companies, even paper companies making a huge profit on toilet paper.
The list goes on to the tune of; cost per inmate per year of $40,000 and up to $70,000 per year for older inmates with health issues. Average $55,000 times 2.5 million inmates on any particular day and that is a burden the tax payer doesn’t need. This cost does not include those other 4 million people that are in county jails, on parole or probation.
To use looming unemployment of prison employees and reduced profits of the prison industrial complex as an excuse to put forward this sick cultural phenomenon is just that. SICK!
In the mean time we are firing teachers and not refilling positions all over the country when education is precisely what our future citizen’s need.
We are a country biting of our nose in spite of our face; eating our own entrails.
grassrootsleadership.org says / “Privatization erodes public control and oversight. Nowhere is privatization more insidious than in the corporate takeover of our criminal justice system. For-profit corporations own and run hundreds of prisons, jails, and detention centers in this country. For these companies, every prisoner is a profit center, every crime a business opportunity, and rehabilitation is bad for business.” This flows over into the public sector as far as I am concerned because any way you look at it the tax payer is footing the bill.
Thirty years ago we doubled felony sentencing and added mandatory minimums taking away a judges responsibility to make determinations according to circumstance. We then added the AEDPA and rubber stamped every conviction by the denial of habeas corpus. This subliminally gives the lower courts free reign to do whatever they would like in overcharging and over-sentencing with no fear of the consequence for unethical behavior. Our prosecutors have more power than any other entity and we have virtually criminalized the District Attorney’s by making these bad decisions. This quadruple whammy is costing the tax payer billion’s annually and costing inmates and families, as victims of our criminal justice system, more in suffering.
I urge you to do everything you can to put this bill S.306 forward.
Respectfully,
Mary-Ellen Pecci
Jim Webbs bill, The Second Chance Act, S. 306, for a commission to study criminal justice reform is taking too long to move forward. This is supported by several hundred organizations, and millions of people. What is the problem; why the stall tactic?
Corrections Corporation of America is now buying an Ohio State Prison. We need to reduce our prison population, not continue 'as is' for profit. Who are their lobbyists? Who is being subtly paid off? How many of our decision makers own stock in this publicly traded company? These are some of the questions that need answering in order to discover where and why the passing of this bill is stalled.
OK, the deficit is not the problem here; could it be the fear of unemployment? Those who want Obama out want to keep those numbers where they are. At the same time they don’t want to increase unemployment, by decreasing the number of prison guards. Everyone in the U.S. Congress appears to be sitting on their hands, regarding S.306.
Prison Guards unions and others involved in our “Incarceration Nation” are being coddled; the barbed wire companies, the telephone companies, the canteen companies, the clothing manufacturers, shoe companies, even paper companies making a huge profit on toilet paper.
The list goes on to the tune of; cost per inmate per year of $40,000 and up to $70,000 per year for older inmates with health issues. Average $55,000 times 2.5 million inmates on any particular day and that is a burden the tax payer doesn’t need. This cost does not include those other 4 million people that are in county jails, on parole or probation.
To use looming unemployment of prison employees and reduced profits of the prison industrial complex as an excuse to put forward this sick cultural phenomenon is just that. SICK!
In the mean time we are firing teachers and not refilling positions all over the country when education is precisely what our future citizen’s need.
We are a country biting of our nose in spite of our face; eating our own entrails.
grassrootsleadership.org says / “Privatization erodes public control and oversight. Nowhere is privatization more insidious than in the corporate takeover of our criminal justice system. For-profit corporations own and run hundreds of prisons, jails, and detention centers in this country. For these companies, every prisoner is a profit center, every crime a business opportunity, and rehabilitation is bad for business.” This flows over into the public sector as far as I am concerned because any way you look at it the tax payer is footing the bill.
Thirty years ago we doubled felony sentencing and added mandatory minimums taking away a judges responsibility to make determinations according to circumstance. We then added the AEDPA and rubber stamped every conviction by the denial of habeas corpus. This subliminally gives the lower courts free reign to do whatever they would like in overcharging and over-sentencing with no fear of the consequence for unethical behavior. Our prosecutors have more power than any other entity and we have virtually criminalized the District Attorney’s by making these bad decisions. This quadruple whammy is costing the tax payer billion’s annually and costing inmates and families, as victims of our criminal justice system, more in suffering.
I urge you to do everything you can to put this bill S.306 forward.
Respectfully,
Mary-Ellen Pecci
Sunday, August 21, 2011
Pseudo Obituary
Richard "Dick" Cheney 1940-2011
Founder of the Corporate/Government Hybrid Structure.
If anyone in U.S. politics died fifty years too late it was Dick Cheney. He lived his last years in redoubt at his ranch in Wyoming. More noteworthy than his dislocation from national politics was his lack of a pulse due to the continuous pressure of a heart assist device. Mr. Cheney died as an apt metaphor for his life in the corpora-political world he fostered - operating pulseless from a remote location.
He received his political science education in the early and mid 60's, when Eisenhower's warnings of a military industrial complex subsuming healthy government were increasingly disregarded. Mr. Cheney saw the depth and width of public treasure flowing to that complex through the white house and surfed upon it to his first job - aid to Richard "Tricky Dick" Nixon. Mr. Cheney functioned exquisitely as a defense contractor liaison to the white house under both presidents Nixon and Ford, for as long as he could sustain the Vietnam conflict. In his seven years there he dug an information hole so deep that he crapped the Vietnam post conflict analysis ("Tiger Team Report") into the void upon departure and echoes of it hitting bottom were not heard until he finished six terms in the House of Representatives. Without an obvious or large scale military conflict for focus Mr. Cheney became the progenitor of a new western energy politics that saw no destructive edict, tenet nor philosophy not worthy of full government subsidy. This stretch in the federal legislature completed his maturity in the corporate dark arts.
Reminiscent of his jump from political science PhD student to white house insider, Cheney became CEO and chairman of energy market manipulation giant Halliburton. This made him George H.W. Bush's choice for secretary of defense, during which time he developed his greatest facility for, and impunity to, government/ corporate double agency. He transferred so much public treasure to private enterprise, through non-competitive sealed bid contracts and waivers of taxes and fees, that when the next competitive republican election came around in 2000 he was the logical backstop to candidate George W. Bush.
As vice presidential candidate Mr. Cheney's sheer political mass countered electoral gravity and allowed Supreme Court appointment of him and Mr. Bush as co-chief executives of the United States of America. He was rewarded with free reign to continue the same deceptions as his previous two unelected tenures in executive power. Mr. Cheney executed in a hunkered down, off the reservation, new world political mode akin to the Colonel Kurtz character in Apocalypse Now. The metaphorical information pit was transformed into a literal walk-in safe and no business conducted in the Vice-President's office was public. The materials and matters that passed through the safe and office will never be known, thus the preposterous safe - not without irony, became a metaphor for the redefining and subversive execution of his public obligations; perfectly analogous to Marlon Brando's portrayal of Col. Kurtz. His most salient public statement during the grinding collapse of the republic he was supposed to be protecting was telling Representative Patrick Leahy to go fuck himself, after a contentious visit to the chamber - a government entity that he was truly, rather than by political wrenching, the president of. The net result of this third tenure was that so much more public revenue was transferred to the private banking, energy and defense sectors that the U.S. economy collapsed in concert with the end of his second term.
Mr. Cheney's function as public to private money funnel was finally exhausted. His corporate patron, Halliburton, had relocated to the United Arab Emirates in advance of the financial collapse and could no longer bear the liability of his name on their letter head. He punctuated his retreat to rural Wyoming with an autobiography that obtusely disregarded his own obtuse disregard for his public obligations. The tome was a deathbed rationalization of his deference to the corporate construct as generally beneficial. The public received it as yet another "GO fuck yourself!" from the most successfully subversive politician in U.S. history.
Even the secret service agents that preserved his pulseless body so far beyond its deserved span knew the detriment he brought to millions. Joblessness, reduced public and private pensions, and the structural financial damage to the U.S. will always remind people of democratic philosophy that Dick Cheney fucked them with abject capitalism; and assassinated the compatible democratic capitalism that came before him.
Jason Pecci
Founder of the Corporate/Government Hybrid Structure.
If anyone in U.S. politics died fifty years too late it was Dick Cheney. He lived his last years in redoubt at his ranch in Wyoming. More noteworthy than his dislocation from national politics was his lack of a pulse due to the continuous pressure of a heart assist device. Mr. Cheney died as an apt metaphor for his life in the corpora-political world he fostered - operating pulseless from a remote location.
He received his political science education in the early and mid 60's, when Eisenhower's warnings of a military industrial complex subsuming healthy government were increasingly disregarded. Mr. Cheney saw the depth and width of public treasure flowing to that complex through the white house and surfed upon it to his first job - aid to Richard "Tricky Dick" Nixon. Mr. Cheney functioned exquisitely as a defense contractor liaison to the white house under both presidents Nixon and Ford, for as long as he could sustain the Vietnam conflict. In his seven years there he dug an information hole so deep that he crapped the Vietnam post conflict analysis ("Tiger Team Report") into the void upon departure and echoes of it hitting bottom were not heard until he finished six terms in the House of Representatives. Without an obvious or large scale military conflict for focus Mr. Cheney became the progenitor of a new western energy politics that saw no destructive edict, tenet nor philosophy not worthy of full government subsidy. This stretch in the federal legislature completed his maturity in the corporate dark arts.
Reminiscent of his jump from political science PhD student to white house insider, Cheney became CEO and chairman of energy market manipulation giant Halliburton. This made him George H.W. Bush's choice for secretary of defense, during which time he developed his greatest facility for, and impunity to, government/ corporate double agency. He transferred so much public treasure to private enterprise, through non-competitive sealed bid contracts and waivers of taxes and fees, that when the next competitive republican election came around in 2000 he was the logical backstop to candidate George W. Bush.
As vice presidential candidate Mr. Cheney's sheer political mass countered electoral gravity and allowed Supreme Court appointment of him and Mr. Bush as co-chief executives of the United States of America. He was rewarded with free reign to continue the same deceptions as his previous two unelected tenures in executive power. Mr. Cheney executed in a hunkered down, off the reservation, new world political mode akin to the Colonel Kurtz character in Apocalypse Now. The metaphorical information pit was transformed into a literal walk-in safe and no business conducted in the Vice-President's office was public. The materials and matters that passed through the safe and office will never be known, thus the preposterous safe - not without irony, became a metaphor for the redefining and subversive execution of his public obligations; perfectly analogous to Marlon Brando's portrayal of Col. Kurtz. His most salient public statement during the grinding collapse of the republic he was supposed to be protecting was telling Representative Patrick Leahy to go fuck himself, after a contentious visit to the chamber - a government entity that he was truly, rather than by political wrenching, the president of. The net result of this third tenure was that so much more public revenue was transferred to the private banking, energy and defense sectors that the U.S. economy collapsed in concert with the end of his second term.
Mr. Cheney's function as public to private money funnel was finally exhausted. His corporate patron, Halliburton, had relocated to the United Arab Emirates in advance of the financial collapse and could no longer bear the liability of his name on their letter head. He punctuated his retreat to rural Wyoming with an autobiography that obtusely disregarded his own obtuse disregard for his public obligations. The tome was a deathbed rationalization of his deference to the corporate construct as generally beneficial. The public received it as yet another "GO fuck yourself!" from the most successfully subversive politician in U.S. history.
Even the secret service agents that preserved his pulseless body so far beyond its deserved span knew the detriment he brought to millions. Joblessness, reduced public and private pensions, and the structural financial damage to the U.S. will always remind people of democratic philosophy that Dick Cheney fucked them with abject capitalism; and assassinated the compatible democratic capitalism that came before him.
Jason Pecci
Sunday, August 7, 2011
try this url
http://www.uma.edu/spring2011deanslist.html. I believe if you click on this url it will put this site into a better position on Google page. It might be nice if it were 1st on the list for my job hunting excursion. I will be graduating in December and need a good job in order to fly back and forth to Colorado to visit Jason. Have a good rest of the summer. Mary-Ellen
Friday, January 28, 2011
To Understand Your Convicts, Know Your Legal System
To Understand Your Convicts, Know Your Legal System
"You know what I hated most about prison? The guys who pretended they wanted to get out." -Jeremy Renner character in 'The Town'
That simple quote paints a broad picture of the incarcerated in the U.S. One should appreciate such a concise line for its density and ability to present a full sub-total at a pivotal point in a good movie. The execution of such good drama should also warn you of the falsity of the statement. Nobody wants to stay.
Most people accept their sentences, estimate survivability and hope to not die in prison. I know of no amount of de-socialization nor institutionalization that renders an inmate void of desire to get out of prison. Numerous degrees of resignation and/or denial exist in inmates, usually proportional to their sentence as a fraction of their life expectancy and their mental fortitude, as necessary adaptations to a shitty environment. None of these mental contortions leads to a state of institutional denial where a person feigns interest in leaving yet prefers prison life. Resignation is not preference.
What incarceration offers is a break from the relative motion of non¬-incarcerated life. An onerous timeout whereby a person is beat down the Mazlow hierarchy to a survival routine, and social needs become a glow below the horizon. The effectiveness of prison is the acute sensation of arrested motion contrasted with outside life - trials, tribulations, money, social interaction, pleasure, pain and the general "What's next?" joie de vivre of western social existence. The glow below the horizon is always visible and it is disingenuous to believe that that glow holds no allure, especially in contrast to prison.
Now there is a class of social predator inmate that the author of the quote is likely referring to. Natural born to the socialistic environment coercion of the less adapted, these true convicts are scumbags comprised of naked hostility and greed who exercise extortion, intimidation and violent whim to distinguish themselves disproportionately to the suffering they cause; the prison ambitious that step on the rank and file to appear taller. Without law school intellect nor military comportment they ply the trades of prosecutors and cops, from the other side of appearance - same game, different arena.
The arena outside prison uses the “what’s next?” dynamic of modern life as camouflage for the manipulation game. Coy and righteous, it flows from U.S. courthouses in high rhetoric, the silk tie barbarians protecting you from the hoodlum barbarians. Converted to prison denim barbarians for your supposed protection, you are expected to believe they are best acclimated for prison and do not wish to return to the outside. Bullshit! They are the competition locked out of the ivory tower and incarcerated to keep them from breeching the moat. The class of inmate you are expected to believe wants to remain in prison is the social equal, in their respective environment, to the cop, prosecutor and judge. Each pulls levers of coercion to elevate themselves by extreme victimization.
“Every cop is a criminal, every sinner, [a] saint. Just call me Lucifer because I’m in need of some restraint.” – Rolling Stones, 'Sympathy for the Devil'
So, as nice as it is to imagine people so fucked up that they want to stay in prison – oh! How easy to rationalize a clear conscience; “they belong there and want to stay there” – they do not exist. What exists are people getting progressively more fucked up while genuinely wanting to get out. This truth is manifest in the continuation of the lead quote. Mr. Renner concludes: “If this thing goes sideways I’m going to have to hold court in the street. I’m not going back [to prison],” a concise and accurate way of saying that the dynamic conclusion of dying in a shootout is preferable to the arrested motion of life in prison.
"You know what I hated most about prison? The guys who pretended they wanted to get out." -Jeremy Renner character in 'The Town'
That simple quote paints a broad picture of the incarcerated in the U.S. One should appreciate such a concise line for its density and ability to present a full sub-total at a pivotal point in a good movie. The execution of such good drama should also warn you of the falsity of the statement. Nobody wants to stay.
Most people accept their sentences, estimate survivability and hope to not die in prison. I know of no amount of de-socialization nor institutionalization that renders an inmate void of desire to get out of prison. Numerous degrees of resignation and/or denial exist in inmates, usually proportional to their sentence as a fraction of their life expectancy and their mental fortitude, as necessary adaptations to a shitty environment. None of these mental contortions leads to a state of institutional denial where a person feigns interest in leaving yet prefers prison life. Resignation is not preference.
What incarceration offers is a break from the relative motion of non¬-incarcerated life. An onerous timeout whereby a person is beat down the Mazlow hierarchy to a survival routine, and social needs become a glow below the horizon. The effectiveness of prison is the acute sensation of arrested motion contrasted with outside life - trials, tribulations, money, social interaction, pleasure, pain and the general "What's next?" joie de vivre of western social existence. The glow below the horizon is always visible and it is disingenuous to believe that that glow holds no allure, especially in contrast to prison.
Now there is a class of social predator inmate that the author of the quote is likely referring to. Natural born to the socialistic environment coercion of the less adapted, these true convicts are scumbags comprised of naked hostility and greed who exercise extortion, intimidation and violent whim to distinguish themselves disproportionately to the suffering they cause; the prison ambitious that step on the rank and file to appear taller. Without law school intellect nor military comportment they ply the trades of prosecutors and cops, from the other side of appearance - same game, different arena.
The arena outside prison uses the “what’s next?” dynamic of modern life as camouflage for the manipulation game. Coy and righteous, it flows from U.S. courthouses in high rhetoric, the silk tie barbarians protecting you from the hoodlum barbarians. Converted to prison denim barbarians for your supposed protection, you are expected to believe they are best acclimated for prison and do not wish to return to the outside. Bullshit! They are the competition locked out of the ivory tower and incarcerated to keep them from breeching the moat. The class of inmate you are expected to believe wants to remain in prison is the social equal, in their respective environment, to the cop, prosecutor and judge. Each pulls levers of coercion to elevate themselves by extreme victimization.
“Every cop is a criminal, every sinner, [a] saint. Just call me Lucifer because I’m in need of some restraint.” – Rolling Stones, 'Sympathy for the Devil'
So, as nice as it is to imagine people so fucked up that they want to stay in prison – oh! How easy to rationalize a clear conscience; “they belong there and want to stay there” – they do not exist. What exists are people getting progressively more fucked up while genuinely wanting to get out. This truth is manifest in the continuation of the lead quote. Mr. Renner concludes: “If this thing goes sideways I’m going to have to hold court in the street. I’m not going back [to prison],” a concise and accurate way of saying that the dynamic conclusion of dying in a shootout is preferable to the arrested motion of life in prison.
Friday, December 31, 2010
Letters to foul judicial compatriots
TO:Eighth Judicial District of Colorado, case no. Ol-CR-465 Sentencing Judge, Terrence Gilmore
Upon the recent collapse of my petition for habeas corpus to the Federal District of Colorado I have had to accept that the treachery of Kathryn Hay does not constitute legal representation below expectation of the Sixth Amendment.
As you are aware, from the content of my attempts at post¬-conviction remedy, Ms. Hay assumed the prosecution's mantle of making aggrandized misrepresentations to the court. The prosecution had no cause to refute her duplicity on their behalf and that false foundation favored a maximum sentence. Expedience minimized victim family backlash and was offensive only to the evidence and to the defendant. I suspect we do not disagree that I am a dupe squared - the dupe of Ms. Hay who is in turn a dupe of…
My family and I are aware that you cannot acknowledge this subjugated master structure of the public defender/prosecution court system. We hope that in lieu of acknowledgment you can sign the attached, legally vacuous, statement. It meets the judicial expectancy of non-accountability while proffering the pseudo-legal pabulum that parole boards lap up. This could provide some correction to Kathryn Hay's treachery without acknowledging the genesis nor systemic necessity of her civil perversion.
Conversely, if you cannot respond affirmatively, I hope you may reply as to why a maximum sentence was your exclusive choice.
Thank You,
Jason Pecci
*Congratulations on your success in this regard. I was not able to develop that species of avoidance, which is the de rigueur talent for success in our western culture. Please consider me to proof your memoir when it is drafted.
TO:Public Defenders Office, Eighth Judicial District of Colorado, Case No. Ol-CR-465
Kathryn Hay
The collapse of my federal habeas corpus has proven, after nine years and the review of three courts, that your treacherous representation of me did not fall below the Sixth Amendment expectation of representation. All three courts honor you by faithfully reiterating your fabrications as grounds to not perform the discovery you avoided.
In retrospect my family and I would not have been surprised if you could not have defended against lies perpetrated by the prosecution - thus is the design of the system. I believe that may have been what you were tacitly telling me when you brought your boss to sell me on the plea agreement - that your office could not provide a defense. What has absolutely disgusted us is that you chose to provide an offense and fabricated false circumstances exactly diametric to the true circumstances; which you had extolled to my family as basis for a defense.
I suspect you saw the doormat in me that brings out the victimizer in women of repressed misandry. You exercised a new species of distilled, high speed, misandry based treachery on me that only my mother foresaw. The fact that nobody would believe her accurate estimate of you then and no court will disbelieve your lies now is the greatest injustice deriving from your foul existence.
Sincerely,
Jason Pecci
Upon the recent collapse of my petition for habeas corpus to the Federal District of Colorado I have had to accept that the treachery of Kathryn Hay does not constitute legal representation below expectation of the Sixth Amendment.
As you are aware, from the content of my attempts at post¬-conviction remedy, Ms. Hay assumed the prosecution's mantle of making aggrandized misrepresentations to the court. The prosecution had no cause to refute her duplicity on their behalf and that false foundation favored a maximum sentence. Expedience minimized victim family backlash and was offensive only to the evidence and to the defendant. I suspect we do not disagree that I am a dupe squared - the dupe of Ms. Hay who is in turn a dupe of…
My family and I are aware that you cannot acknowledge this subjugated master structure of the public defender/prosecution court system. We hope that in lieu of acknowledgment you can sign the attached, legally vacuous, statement. It meets the judicial expectancy of non-accountability while proffering the pseudo-legal pabulum that parole boards lap up. This could provide some correction to Kathryn Hay's treachery without acknowledging the genesis nor systemic necessity of her civil perversion.
Conversely, if you cannot respond affirmatively, I hope you may reply as to why a maximum sentence was your exclusive choice.
Thank You,
Jason Pecci
*Congratulations on your success in this regard. I was not able to develop that species of avoidance, which is the de rigueur talent for success in our western culture. Please consider me to proof your memoir when it is drafted.
TO:Public Defenders Office, Eighth Judicial District of Colorado, Case No. Ol-CR-465
Kathryn Hay
The collapse of my federal habeas corpus has proven, after nine years and the review of three courts, that your treacherous representation of me did not fall below the Sixth Amendment expectation of representation. All three courts honor you by faithfully reiterating your fabrications as grounds to not perform the discovery you avoided.
In retrospect my family and I would not have been surprised if you could not have defended against lies perpetrated by the prosecution - thus is the design of the system. I believe that may have been what you were tacitly telling me when you brought your boss to sell me on the plea agreement - that your office could not provide a defense. What has absolutely disgusted us is that you chose to provide an offense and fabricated false circumstances exactly diametric to the true circumstances; which you had extolled to my family as basis for a defense.
I suspect you saw the doormat in me that brings out the victimizer in women of repressed misandry. You exercised a new species of distilled, high speed, misandry based treachery on me that only my mother foresaw. The fact that nobody would believe her accurate estimate of you then and no court will disbelieve your lies now is the greatest injustice deriving from your foul existence.
Sincerely,
Jason Pecci
Subscribe to:
Posts (Atom)