Letters to foul judicial compatriots

TO:Eighth Judicial District of Colorado, case no. Ol-CR-465 Sentencing Judge, Terrence Gilmore

Upon the recent collapse of my petition for habeas corpus to the Federal District of Colorado I have had to accept that the treachery of Kathryn Hay does not constitute legal representation below expectation of the Sixth Amendment.
As you are aware, from the content of my attempts at post¬-conviction remedy, Ms. Hay assumed the prosecution's mantle of making aggrandized misrepresentations to the court. The prosecution had no cause to refute her duplicity on their behalf and that false foundation favored a maximum sentence. Expedience minimized victim family backlash and was offensive only to the evidence and to the defendant. I suspect we do not disagree that I am a dupe squared - the dupe of Ms. Hay who is in turn a dupe of…

My family and I are aware that you cannot acknowledge this subjugated master structure of the public defender/prosecution court system. We hope that in lieu of acknowledgment you can sign the attached, legally vacuous, statement. It meets the judicial expectancy of non-accountability while proffering the pseudo-legal pabulum that parole boards lap up. This could provide some correction to Kathryn Hay's treachery without acknowledging the genesis nor systemic necessity of her civil perversion.

Conversely, if you cannot respond affirmatively, I hope you may reply as to why a maximum sentence was your exclusive choice.

Thank You,
Jason Pecci

*Congratulations on your success in this regard. I was not able to develop that species of avoidance, which is the de rigueur talent for success in our western culture. Please consider me to proof your memoir when it is drafted.



TO:Public Defenders Office, Eighth Judicial District of Colorado, Case No. Ol-CR-465
Kathryn Hay

The collapse of my federal habeas corpus has proven, after nine years and the review of three courts, that your treacherous representation of me did not fall below the Sixth Amendment expectation of representation. All three courts honor you by faithfully reiterating your fabrications as grounds to not perform the discovery you avoided.

In retrospect my family and I would not have been surprised if you could not have defended against lies perpetrated by the prosecution - thus is the design of the system. I believe that may have been what you were tacitly telling me when you brought your boss to sell me on the plea agreement - that your office could not provide a defense. What has absolutely disgusted us is that you chose to provide an offense and fabricated false circumstances exactly diametric to the true circumstances; which you had extolled to my family as basis for a defense.

I suspect you saw the doormat in me that brings out the victimizer in women of repressed misandry. You exercised a new species of distilled, high speed, misandry based treachery on me that only my mother foresaw. The fact that nobody would believe her accurate estimate of you then and no court will disbelieve your lies now is the greatest injustice deriving from your foul existence.

Sincerely,
Jason Pecci